There are different ways of promoting innovation, considering the context, the sector and the structure of the company. It is important to highlight the importance of aligning structure, strategy and innovation systems. Theories need to adapt to the real context of companies so that they can contribute to better performance. As contributions to companies, it is possible to highlight the possibility of reflecting on the need to know the innovation capacities of companies.
Emphasis should be placed on the sustainability theme within companies, whether of basic production, such as petrochemical, or closer to the final consumer such as Natura. It is also important to highlight how much innovation becomes more relevant within companies when they are within the company's strategic plan.
Some limitations to the accomplishment of this study, which can be mentioned, were the difficulties found to conduct a research that could contemplate the opinion of managers from all areas involved with innovation.
In addition, this is a research developed with a qualitative approach, based on the information provided by the interviewees and subject to change, as well as subjectivity in the data treatment by the researcher. For those interested in pursuing this study, it is possible to advance even further by proceeding with an in-depth study of the opinion of managers from other areas of the two companies and by also making an analysis of the quantitative results generated by the product innovation from both companies.
Accessed: April, Aichouche, K. Open innovation: a new mechanism for adoption of organizational. International Journal of Innovation, 4 2 , Amabile, T.
Creativity and Inovation in organizations. Havard Business School, 5 , Baxter, M. Bell, M. The development of technological capabilities. In: Trade, technology and international competitiveness. World Bank, Washington, DC. Bernardes, R. Burns, T. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, Londres. Chesborough, H. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Clark, K. Managing new product and process development: text and cases. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Coral, E. In: Coral, E. Cooper, R. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 3 , After StageGate. Research-Technology Management, JanuaryFebruary, Davila, T. Porto Alegre: Bookman. Desai, A. India technological capability — An analysis of its achievements and limits. Research Policy, 13 5 , Dyer, B. Innovation strategy and sanctioned conflict: a new edge in innovation? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15 6 , Docherty, M. Primer on ''Open Innovation'': Principles and Practice.
Visions, 30 2 , Felin, T. Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43, — Ferro, A. Freeman, C. The economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press, Forsman, H.
Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, 40 5, Fuchs, P, Mifflin, K. Strategic integration: competing in the age of capabilities. California Management Review, 42 3. Hamel, G. The Future of Management. Hana, U. Competitive Advantage Achievement through Innovation and Knowledge.
Journal of Competitiveness. Hao, Q. How does organizational structure influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China? Chinese Management Studies, 6 1 , Katz, J.
Domestic technological innovations and dynamic comparative advantage. Journal of Development Economics, 16 , Lall, S. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20 2, Lawson, B. Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach.
International Journal of Innovation Management, 5 3, Maehler, A. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6 3. Marinova, D. Models of innovation.
In: Shavinina, L. The International Handbook on Innovation. Oxford: Elsevier Science, Part II, cap. Available at: www.
Accessed: april 20th, In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 26 1 : Panizzon, M. Patel, P. Research Policy, 26 2 , Porter, M. Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan, New York, Prahalad, C. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68 3 , Pufal, N. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Rush, H. Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool. All cracking reasons to encourage innovation in your business, but all of this potential can only be reached with effective innovation management processes in place.
The nuances of innovation management are very much linked to the different types of innovation. This is the most common type of innovation because it is less daunting and a more realistic way of bringing about innovation.
Incremental innovation is to spot opportunities for improvements within existing tools, processes, technology and markets. Incremental innovation is subtle but effective and still requires a level of innovation management. This helps transform ideas into action whilst creating a feedback loop back to the employee who came up with the idea in the first place. Also known as stealth innovation, disruptive innovation is often expensive and considered superior to anything else in existence.
This type of innovation is about positioning. The technology itself is already used and effective in other areas of the market or your business. One of your departments, for instance, could already be using collaborative technology that you decide to implement across the business or use to build a customer-facing community.
Architectural innovation is taking something that already works and using it in a different way or with a different user base and market.
The risks are lower because you know the technology works, you just need to adapt and prepare it for the needs of the alternative user base. The first airplane, the first mobile phone, the first laptop and tablet are all examples of radical innovation. Even the most creative ideas need process and structure to pull them off in reality. Viewing innovation under these four categories highlights the many opportunities for innovation in your business, but also how important it is to have effective innovation management in place.
Want to find out more about different types of innovation and learn how to innovate more effectively? Many businesses have the desire to innovate but struggle to do so amidst varying operational pressures and external requests. Justifying budget and finding time to actually implement innovative ideas is a challenge for many businesses. The full lifecycle of innovation includes four key elements that help drive them from an initial idea to action and a successful end result.
These are:. Our idea management software takes this further by breaking these phases down into incremental steps. Taking you through each stage of development in a way that is both concise and manageable but also likely to inspire your next move. These include:. Innovation management is the key to turning innovative ideas into action, but only if it is done well. Like any management process, it needs the right tools in place to facilitate progress.
Ironically many businesses are keen to innovate but are not very innovative about their approach to innovation management. How can you and your company become blue-ribbon management innovators? General Electric. What makes them stand out? Great products? Great people? Great leaders? But if you dig deeper, you will find another, more fundamental reason for their success: management innovation. As these examples show, a management breakthrough can deliver a potent advantage to the innovating company and produce a seismic shift in industry leadership.
Technology and product innovation, by comparison, tend to deliver small-caliber advantages. A management innovation creates long-lasting advantage when it meets one or more of three conditions: The innovation is based on a novel principle that challenges management orthodoxy; it is systemic, encompassing a range of processes and methods; and it is part of an ongoing program of invention, where progress compounds over time.
Three brief cases illustrate the ways in which management innovation can create enduring success. Unlike its Western rivals, Toyota has long believed that first-line employees can be more than cogs in a soulless manufacturing machine; they can be problem solvers, innovators, and change agents. While American companies relied on staff experts to come up with process improvements, Toyota gave every employee the skills, the tools, and the permission to solve problems as they arose and to head off new problems before they occurred.
The result: Year after year, Toyota has been able to get more out of its people than its competitors have been able to get out of theirs. As this example illustrates, management orthodoxies are often so deeply ingrained in executive thinking that they are nearly invisible and are so devoutly held that they are practically unassailable.
The more unconventional the principle underlying a management innovation, the longer it will take competitors to respond. In some cases, the head-scratching can go on for decades. While other grocery chains have been slashing costs to fend off Wal-Mart, Whole Foods has been rapidly evolving an extraordinary retail model—one that already delivers the highest profits per square foot in the industry.
Managers consult teams on all store-level decisions and grant them a degree of autonomy that is nearly unprecedented in retailing. Each team decides what to stock and can veto new hires. What differentiates Whole Foods is not a single management process but a distinctive management system. Confronted by management innovation this comprehensive, rivals can do little more than shake their heads in wonder.
Sometimes a company can create a sizable management advantage simply by being persistent. Not every management innovation creates competitive advantage, however. Innovation in whatever form follows a power law: For every truly radical idea that delivers a big dollop of competitive advantage, there will be dozens of other ideas that prove to be less valuable.
Innovation is always a numbers game; the more of it you do, the better your chances of reaping a fat payoff. A management innovation can be defined as a marked departure from traditional management principles, processes, and practices or a departure from customary organizational forms that significantly alters the way the work of management is performed.
Put simply, management innovation changes how managers do what they do. And what do managers do? Typically, managerial work includes. In a big organization, the only way to change how managers work is to reinvent the processes that govern that work.
Management processes such as strategic planning, capital budgeting, project management, hiring and promotion, employee assessment, executive development, internal communications, and knowledge management are the gears that turn management principles into everyday practices. They establish the recipes and rituals that govern the work of managers.
In most companies, management innovation is ad hoc and incremental. A systematic process for producing bold management breakthroughs must include. Key changes included. Translating a novel management idea like innovation from everyone, everywhere into new and deeply rooted management practices requires a sustained and broad-based effort, but the payoff can be substantial.
I have yet to meet a senior executive who claims that his or her company has a praiseworthy process for management innovation. As with other types of innovation, the biggest challenge is generating truly novel ideas.
Some of the essential components are. Chunky problems. Fresh principles. Unorthodox thinking. Wisdom from the fringe. These multipliers of human creativity are as pivotal to management innovation as they are to every other kind of innovation.
The bigger the problem, the bigger the opportunity for innovation. Nearly 80 years ago, General Motors invented the divisionalized organization structure in response to a seemingly intractable problem: how to bring order to the sprawling family of companies that had been assembled by William C.
Sloan, Jr. Thanks to this management innovation, GM was able to take advantage of its scale and scope. It takes fortitude and perseverance, as well as imagination, to solve big problems. These qualities are most abundant when a problem is not only important but also inspiring. Frederick Winslow Taylor, arguably the most important management innovator of the twentieth century, is usually portrayed as a hard-nosed engineer, intent on mechanizing work and pushing employees to the max.
Awkward, inefficient, or ill-directed movements of men, however, leave nothing visible or tangible behind them. Their appreciation calls for an act of memory, an effort of the imagination.
And for this reason, even though our daily loss from this source is greater than from our waste of material things, the one has stirred us deeply, while the other has moved us but little. To maximize the chances of a management breakthrough, you need to start with a problem that is both consequential and soul stirring.
First, what are the tough trade-offs that your company never seems to get right? Management innovation is often driven by the desire to transcend such trade-offs, which can appear to be irreconcilable.
Open source development, for example, encompasses two antithetical ideas: radical decentralization and disciplined, large-scale project management.
Maybe you believe that your organization has become less and less agile as it has pursued the advantages of size and scale. Second, what are big organizations bad at? This question should produce a long list of incompetencies.
Third, what are the emerging challenges the future has in store for your company? Try to imagine them: An ever-accelerating pace of change.
Rapidly escalating customer power. Near instant commoditization of products and services. Ultra-low-cost competitors. A new generation of consumers that is hype resistant and deeply cynical about big business. Nearly all began with the call for a new kind of leadership.
Umesh Gupta stated, "Innovation … is directly proportional to the attitude of senior management. Elliott pointed out that "innovations and inefficiencies are persistent anomalies in organizations. Other models for innovation were suggested. For example, given the proliferation of networking technologies, will more and more innovation be carried out in communities that cross corporate lines?
Following from this, one has to ask whether truly large innovations needed by society will be achieved without traditional leadership or even, up to some point in the process, traditional rules of competition in so-called "open source" environments of the kind that have prevailed up to now largely in academia.
What do you think? In early December, a colloquium on "Creativity, Entrepreneurship, and Organizations of the Future" is being held as part of the th anniversary celebration at the Harvard Business School. To kick off the colloquium, senior managers of 4 sizeable organizations heavily involved in innovation have been asked to pose "burning questions" to the assembled researchers and practitioners of innovation and creativity.
0コメント